Legal Opinion

Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 6, 2014No. 12-P-956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeade, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the denial of their motion for sanctions against Bingham McCutchen LLP (Bingham), intervener, the law firm that defended Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill), in the 2002 jury trial of this action. The plaintiffs claim that in that litigation Bingham wrongfully withheld documents relevant to the issue whether Merrill, in handling the accounts of Benistar Property Exchange Trust Company, Inc. (Benistar), knew that Benistar was trading with money belonging to third parties. We hold that Bingham lacked an adequate legal basis, under the guise of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Petition of the Plaintiffs' Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Kendall v. SelvaggioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. DabneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  2. von Schönau-Riedweg v. Continuum Energy Technologies, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API