Legal Opinion
Cole v. Cates
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 10, 1964No. 40954, 40955PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
Except for necessary changes in names, amounts, and contract stipulations, the allegations of this petition are identical with that considered in Hunter v. Benamy, 101 Ga. App. 907 (115 SE2d 424). There, as here, the trial court struck down the first count and upheld the second, but there no cross bill of exceptions was filed. Since the cross bill assigns error on striking count 1, it is not the law of this case, as it was in Hunter, that the sale contract is void but this is one of the issues to be decided. The cross bill of exceptions will be first considered, for, as stated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Rives v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Loftis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Chelsea Corporation v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Fisher v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cole v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Turner v. Sumter Self Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Sparti v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- CHEROKEE INSURANCE CO. v. GravittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- SEC, INC. v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.