Legal Opinion

Brosnan v. Long

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1947No. 31715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Special ground one of the amended motion for new trial complains of the charge of the court respecting the cheek for $10,000 given by the defendant to the plaintiff on which payment was stopped. The court charged the Code, § 14-301, that every 'negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable consideration, etc. While this charge was inapt and inappropriate in that the first count of the suit based solely on the check had been ’ abandoned by the plaintiff, we do not think the charge was reversible error because allegations respecting the check were contained in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Brothers v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Shields v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. CalebSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Bank of Emanuel v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Barnesville v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co. v. Atlanta Taxicabs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Hankinson v. RackleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Tillem v. PetzeltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API