Brosnan v. Long
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Special ground one of the amended motion for new trial complains of the charge of the court respecting the cheek for $10,000 given by the defendant to the plaintiff on which payment was stopped. The court charged the Code, § 14-301, that every 'negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable consideration, etc. While this charge was inapt and inappropriate in that the first count of the suit based solely on the check had been ’ abandoned by the plaintiff, we do not think the charge was reversible error because allegations respecting the check were contained in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Brothers v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Shields v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. CalebSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Bank of Emanuel v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Barnesville v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co. v. Atlanta Taxicabs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Hankinson v. RackleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Tillem v. PetzeltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976