Zavala v. Bartnik
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Jose G. Zavala appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.2009). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Zavala’s assertion of claims under 18 U.S.C. § 242 because it is a criminal statute that does not give rise to civil *213liability. See Allen v. Gold Country Casino, 464 F.3d 1044, 1048 (9th Cir.2006).
The district court properly dismissed Zavala’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Douglas v. NoelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- (PC) O'Brien v. ReedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PC) O'Brien v. ReedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PC) Perez v. CervantesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Brandon Leon Bibbs v. M. MeiserDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Clay (ID 102093) v. HydroDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.