Legal Opinion

Hawley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 1997No. 96-4590PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant James Hawley, having entered a plea of no contest, seeks review of certain court orders relating to his speedy trial period. As to the first grant extending the speedy trial period by 60 days, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding an *1358exceptional circumstance existed to justify the time extension. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.191(2); Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, Routly v. Florida, 468 U.S. 1220, 104 S.Ct. 3591, 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984); Westberry v. State, 700 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Dobbert v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Routly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Westberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hawley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Hawley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API