Legal Opinion

Doriss v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 7, 1944No. Docket Nos. 111730-111744, 111777, 111778, 111779, 111780Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Kern, Judge:

Respondent’s contentions in the instant case are that the estate tax return of the transferor estate was not “filed within the time prescribed by law or prescribed by the Commissioner in pursuance of law,” and was not signed under oath by both executors as required by article 84. Regulations 80, and therefore no valid election was made by the executors to have the estate valued as of a date one year after decedent’s death under the provisions of section 302 (j) of the Revenue Act of 1926, as added by section 202 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1935.1 If respondent’s contentions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Application for a Compulsory Accounting in the Estate of AppellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. In re the Estate of JunkersfeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API