Legal Opinion

American Cyanamid Co. v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1931No. 5919PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Company, referred to hereafter as plaintiff, sued American Cyanamid Company, referred to as defendant, at law to recover overcharges on phosphate rock delivered in the several years 1919 to 1923, inclusive, under a long-time contract for its purchase which plaintiff had made with Amalgamated Phosphate Company in 1911 and modified in 1912. The suit was in four counts; the third being a common count for money had and received. The first, second, and fourth were special counts which, set up the terms of the contract, and that the defendant had in…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bracklein v. Realty Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Press Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. In Re Kentucky Wagon Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1932
  4. Washington Nationall Corp. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Morey MacHinery Co., Inc. v. Great Western Industrial MacHinery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API