Legal Opinion

Poe v. Munich Reinsurance Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 7, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

Upon coming in of the special master’s report, directed by the decree of this court passed on the 30th day of January, last, the respondents filed a number of exceptions. The first is as to the failure of the special master to credit the Munich Reinsurance Company with interest on the sum of $78,154.61 from October 3, 1913, when it paid that sum under a decree entered by the circuit court of Baltimore city. Frankly I am unable to understand upon what this exception is based. That money was directed then to be paid, and was then due. The exception is overruled. ,

*765The next…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. PoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Miller v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API