In re Ingraham
New York Court of Chancery
This was an application by S. Ingraham, ¿? siiarger to the suit brought in this court by H. G„ HhiJonas In-graham and Daniel Bolles, to have a demand which he had against a firm in which the defendants were partners, paid to him out of their funds, in the hands of the receiver.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
There is nothing in the petition which gives to this court any jurisdiction, or authority to interfere.m tbi; ■ summary way, even if the petitioner has a preferable claim on the funds in question. Jf he has any equitable claim to payment out of any funds which belonged to either of the firms, and which claims are affected by the decree in this suit, which is doubtful, at least, upon the facts stated in Ids petition, his proper course is to file a bill, in his own name, making Harrison, and the several members of the firm, defendants in such suit. I *36am inclined to think,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rinn v. . Astor Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Weeks v. CornwallNew York Supreme Court · 1887
- Coddington v. Executors of BisphamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883
- Rinn v. Astor Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874