Legal Opinion

The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Federal Roofing and Painting, Inc. v. Foster Construction (Panama) S.A.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1972No. 71-2369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In the district court Foster, the prime contractor, was held entitled to withhold from Federal, its subcontractor, provable overhead expenses incurred by Foster from project delay caused by Federal in excess of the amount of liquidated damages recovered by the Government against Foster. We affirm.

The amount of liquidated damages which the prime contract required be paid to the Government, as owner of the project, bears no absolute relationship to the amount of overhead expenses suffered by the prime contractor because of the subcontractor’s failure to timely perform its obligations under the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. E & B Specialties Co., Inc. v. PhillipsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API