Legal Opinion

In re Tabitha R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Intervenor has appealed from an order denying her petition for an extension of foster care placement. Because the period of the requested extension has expired, this matter is moot (see, Matter of Darby C., 175 AD2d 959, lv denied 78 NY2d 862). Intervenor has not demonstrated an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-715). (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Family Court, Roman, J. — Extend Placement.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re Darby C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Jerry XX.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re Kevin R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998