Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Niles

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Tort for alleged deceit in falsely and fraudulently representing to the plaintiff that the firm in which the defendant was a partner, who were engaged in a provision business, were doing a business of $150,000 annually, whereby the plaintiff was induced to purchase a one third interest in such business.

Read the full summary

Tort for alleged deceit in falsely and fraudulently representing to the plaintiff that the firm in which the defendant was a partner, who were engaged in a provision business, were doing a business of $150,000 annually, whereby the plaintiff was induced to purchase a one third interest in such business. Writ dated April 9,1908; and Contract, by the defendant in the first case against the plaintiff in that case, on two promissory notes respectively for $2,000 and $1,000, the respective indorsers of the notes also being made defendants. Writ dated March 2,1908. The answers in the second case…

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

These cross-actions grew out of the same occurrences and were tried together. Exceptions were alleged in each. "It will be convenient however to consider them separately.

In the first named action Townsend seeks to recover damages for a fraudulent representation alleged to have been made to *530him by Niles in the sale of a share in a provision business which had been carried on by Niles and one Onthank in Boston. The fraudulent representation alleged in the declaration and found to have been made was that Niles and Onthank were doing a business of #150,000 annually. The questions now presented…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Long v. Inhabitants of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Deming v. DarlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Poland v. BrownellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Brown v. LeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mignault v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Batchelder v. Home National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Eaton v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Noyes v. MeharryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. M & M Co. v. Hood Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API