Legal Opinion
Smith v. Healy
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 7, 2010No. 3:10-cr-00072PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BROWN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion (# 13) for Remand to State Court; the Motion (#9) for Summary Judgment of Defendants Dennis Healy, Holly Healy, Sky Corporation, Ltd., and RED Premium Products, Inc.; and Plaintiffs’ Motion (# 24) for Leave to File [Second] Amended Complaint.
For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand, GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File [Second] Amended Complaint.
BACKGROUND
On January 30, 2008, Plaintiffs filed an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Driscoll's, Inc. v. California Berry Cultivars, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021