Legal Opinion · Dissent

Henson v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 2017No. SD 34731Published

1Dissent

DANIEL E. SCOTT,

DISSENTING.

This court has not found or been cited to directly-controlling authority on our specific issue, ie., do “street, sidewalk, or thoroughfare” in § 82.210 include grassy strips or “parkways”1 between a curb and sidewalk? Reasonable minds may differ, as this case proves, but I think such strips fall within § 82.210 for at least two reasons.

First, the statute lists streets, sidewalks, thoroughfares, and other properties that expose a city, in its proprietary capacity, to common-law liability. Jones v. City of Kansas City, 15 S.W.3d 736, 737 (Mo. banc 2000). For…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Coffey v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Griffin v. City of ChillicotheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Fockler v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Jones v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API