Callaway v. Mellett
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Grant Circuit Court.
1Concurrence 1
Concurring Opinion.
Davis, C. J.
I concur in the result, but not in all the reasoning of Judge Boss.
In their brief, counsel for appellant say this is an action to recover “damages for alleged unlawful expulsion from a passenger train.”
A trial by a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee, for $500.00.
The only error relied on in this court, is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Counsel for appellant say: “The general scope and character of the complaint is that of tort.” The allegations, counsel for appellant insist, “clearly indicate the intention to recover for a…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Gavin.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Godfrey v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GobenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ArnoldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. ConleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.