Legal Opinion

City of Kingsport v. Quillen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCANLESS, Justice.

This case is on direct appeal to determine whether the actions of certain city officials amounted to “willful wrongdoing” so as to bar them from being reimbursed by the city for damages they incurred in a federal civil rights action. The trial court held that the city was obligated to reimburse the city officials. The appellants are Wayne Quillen, a resident of Kingsport, and E. L. Shelor, recorder and treasurer for the City of Kingsport. The Attorney General of Tennessee was made a nominal defendant. The appellees are the City of Kingsport, City Manager Charles K.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Woodroof v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of Chattanooga v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Anderson Fish & Oyster Company v. OldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Mason v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. J. Harold Cagle, Individually and as Next-Friend and Guardian of Todd Lee Cagle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Shaver v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  4. Austin Kelly McCraw Cross-Appellee v. The Elbert L. Kinser Memorial Park Commission, Town of Greeneville and Green County, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Johnson v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API