Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 1980No. 1142PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

The instant appeal is from the order by the trial court sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections to appellant’s complaint in assumpsit. Finding no error, we affirm.

On June 20, 1979, appellant, an attorney, brought a class action suit on behalf of himself and all other parties similarly situated alleging discrimination in the setting of automobile insurance rates by appellee and all other providers of automobile insurance in the Commonwealth. In his capacity as the named plaintiff, appellant purported to represent three groups of residents of the Commonwealth that had…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Gocial v. Independence Blue CrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. United States Jaycees v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Karn v. Quick & Reilly Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Western Pennsylvania Socialist Workers 1982 Campaign v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API