Legal Opinion

Keppel v. BaRoss Builders, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 20, 1986No. 3564PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The defendant, BaRoss Builders, Inc., appeals from the judgment which a state trial referee, exercising the powers of the Superior Court, rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Henry E. Keppel, Jr., and Marilyn L. Keppel, on their suit against the defendant based on claimed deficiencies in its construction of a residence for them. The plaintiffs’ amended complaint was in four counts: breach of contract; failure to complete work contracted for, and completion of some of the work in an unworkmanlike manner; negligent performance of services; and breach of implied warranties under General Statutes…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. John M. Rice v. Arthur L. McKenzie Acting Warden, West Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ryals v. PigottMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Barca v. BarcaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Cahn v. CahnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. State v. William B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API