Legal Opinion
Martin v. Southern Container Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In or around May 1988, when the defendant Southern Container Corp. (hereinafter SCC) hired the plaintiff as a salesperson, the plaintiffs father also worked for SCC as a salesperson. A letter on SCC letterhead addressed to the plaintiff, dated May 31, 1988 (hereinafter the letter agreement), provided, in pertinent part, “[w]e also hereby agree that upon your father’s retirement, you will be permitted to succeed to his accounts.” In addition, at the time of his hiring, the plaintiff was given an Employee Handbook and Benefit Booklet (hereinafter employee handbook).
Eventually, the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lobosco v. New York Telephone Co./NynexNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Barker v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cervini v. ZanoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Niceforo v. UBS Global Asset Management Americas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Sternberg v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Torres v. Louzoun Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Torres v. Louzoun Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013