Legal Opinion

Murray v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1949No. 4633PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment from which appellant has perfected an appeal overruled the defendant’s plea in abatement,' s.et the 'cause for trial upon its merits for May' 31, 1949, continued the temporary restraining order thérétofore granted, and ordered the defendant to pay into the registry of the court *351$50 per month for the support of his minor children, to be paid by the Clerk to plaintiff.

That portion of the judgment which overruled defendant’s plea in abatement is not appealable. Witt v. Witt, Tex. Civ.App., 205 S.W.2d 612. Nor do we find any statutory authority authorizing an appeal from those…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Witt v. WittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Archer v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. City of Lubbock v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Holmes v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Moser v. John F. Buckner & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Stubbs v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API