Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Reich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1899Published

Error to "Wayne; Lillibridge,' J. Assumpsit by Elbridge F. Bacon against William Reich for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant recovered a judgment against the Architectural Iron & Wire Works for a breach of a contract. He was afterwards sued by the assignee of the iron works for the price of the articles furnished to him under the contract, the assignment being made before his action for damages was instituted. In this action he sought to set off or recoup his damages, which was permitted by the trial court. The plaintiff has appealed the case, contending that the claim for damages is merged in the defendant’s judgment, and therefore will not again support an action or defense, and that the judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clark v. . RowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Wyman v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Coles v. Allen, Freer & IllgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Cook v. Parham & BluntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API