Harrison v. Deming, Parker, Hoffman, Green & Campbell, P.C.

Smith, Presiding Judge.

This appeal requires us to determine whether the meaning of OCGA § 34-9-100 (c) was so “well settled, clear, and widely recognized” within the meaning of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue v. American Envirecycle, 217 Ga. App. 80, 83 (2) (456 SE2d 264) (1995) and Littleton v. Stone, 231 Ga. App. 150, 151-152 (1) (497 SE2d 684) (1998), that a failure to comply with the statute will support an action for *472legal malpractice. We find that the trial court correctly concluded it was not, and we affirm the judgment below.

Brenda Harrison brought this legal malpractice action against the…