Legal Opinion

Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 22, 2017No. A14-1679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

This case requires us to determine the extent of a criminal-defense attorney’s obligation under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution to inform a noncitizen defendant of the immigration consequences of a guilty plea. The appellant, Francisco Herrera Sanchez, pleaded guilty to third-degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn. Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(b) (2016), which led to the initiation of removal proceedings against him. In an effort to avoid deportation, Sanchez filed an emergency motion to withdraw his guilty plea, in which he argued, in part, that his…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidele Ndaruhutse v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. People v. Lopez (Carlos)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
  3. People v. Moreno (Romeo)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
  4. Shawn Christopher Brown v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API