Legal Opinion

Commercial Mutual Fire Insurance v. Crawford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, P. J.

The appellants, four insurance companies, issued their policies of fire insurance to the respondent John W. Crawford, insuring his interest in a house and barn on premises in Delaware county. The policies were in standard form and each contained a standard mortgagee clause in favor of the defendant, The Federal Land Bank of Springfield, which had a mortgage on the premises in question. The policies when issued were delivered to the said Crawford and by him to the said mortgagee pursuant to the requirements of the mortgage. Each policy contained this provision: “ This entire policy shall be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Mers v. Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Cross v. National Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Skinner v. . NormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Lasher v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foster v. Illinois Travelers Home, Insurance Co. of ChicagoTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cardinal v. Mercury Insurance Company, John RoshirtNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Foster v. Illinois Travelers Home, Insurance Co. of ChicagoTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API