Legal Opinion

Mills v. Parlin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District; —heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Fulton county; the Hon. S. P. Shops, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scott

The bill in this case was brought by Henry Mills, against William Parlin, William J. Orendorff, William H. Parlin, and the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, and was to enjoin defendants from running or operating steam engines to propel cars over a track laid by defendants in a street of the city of Canton, which switch or track connects with the railroad track of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Cqmpany. Complainant alleges his dwelling house is situated on the street in which the track is laid, and that the running of steam engines over such track or switch will be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stetson v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Richards v. People ex rel. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Railroad Co. v. Iron-WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. B. & N. R. R. v. Town of AlstonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Sullivan v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bedford Quarries Co. v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API