Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schayer v. People

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1894Published

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1DissentReed, J.

I regret that I cannot concur in the conclusion reached by the majority of this court. Were the question less important, I should content myself with entering a dissent, without giving my reasons for differing; but, being of grave importance to the commercial interests of the state, I shall briefly state my objections.

The plaintiff was indicted under section 884, Gen. Stats.: “ If any person, by false representations in writing of his own responsibility, wealth or mercantile correspondence and connection, shall obtain a credit thereby, defraud any person or persons of money, goods, chattels…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  2. United States v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1843
  3. Clark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API