Legal Opinion

Holland v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1991No. 90-03179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellants challenge entry of a final summary judgment in favor of the appel-lees. They argue that there existed material issues of genuine fact precluding resolution by summary judgment. We agree and reverse.

The appellants, Florida Farms, Jerry Don Holland, and Carl J. Denholtz, alleged in their complaint that the appellees CSX Transportation, Inc., and its alleged successor in interest, Seminole Gulf Railway Limited Partnership, violated an agreement that required CSX to maintain a sidetrack located on the appellants’ property. The appellants claimed that CSX…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burroughs Corp. v. AMERICAN DRUGGISTS'INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Lutsch v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Schwartz v. Hughes Supply, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twin City Roofing Construction Specialists, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Financial ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API