Legal Opinion
In re Beeman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 14, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeiss, J.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Viscardi, J.), entered January 17, 1984 in Warren County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 77, inter alia, denied respondents’ motion to compel petitioner to answer certain questions posed at his oral deposition.
The instant proceeding concerns three inter vivos trusts executed simultaneously in 1954 by Charlotte P. Hyde, Nell P. Cunningham and Mary H. Beeman, the corpus of which constitutes the majority of voting stock in a closely held corporation, Finch, Pruyn & Company, Inc. The settlors named both Mary H. Beeman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Accounting of HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Nitz v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Joseph v. . HerzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- In re the Accounting of MootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pinkans v. HulettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Alberi v. RossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Hoopes v. BrunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Barrow v. Lawrence United Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989