Legal Opinion

Pacific Wood Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 10, 1967No. R.D. 11369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement were consolidated for purposes of trial. Pacific Wood Products Company (hereinafter called Pacific) of Los Angeles, California, is the importer of record. That firm financed the purchase of the imported merchandise for Carlson Furniture Industries, Inc. (hereinafter called Carlson), of Gardena, California. James G. Wiley Co. of Los Angeles, California, is a customhouse broker.

The imported merchandise consists of armchair and settee frames which were exported from Yokohama, Japan, by the manufacturer-seller, K.K. Toda Mokko Sho (hereinafter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Heffernan Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Traders Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. F. W. Kuehne Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. United States v. F. W. Kuehne Co.United States Customs Court · 1945
  5. B & W Wholesale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amerimex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API