Legal Opinion

Newman v. United States

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 8, 1981No. CIV 80-418 PCT EHCPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CARROLL, District Judge.

The United States has moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint contending that it has not consented to be sued under the circumstances at issue in this proceeding.

The action was brought by Plaintiff Herbert Newman against the United States and others 1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, to quiet title to certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona. The Plaintiff alleged on information and belief

(T)hat the Defendant UNITED STATES or persons claiming by, through or under it claims that Plaintiff’s lands, under a so-called doctrine of accretion, have accreted to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Wilson v. Omaha Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Morrison v. WorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Louisiana v. GarfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wildman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1981
  3. Spaeth v. United States Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Spaeth v. United States Secretary Of The InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Calhoon v. SellDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API