Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Norwood v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 14, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from Pulaski 'Chancery Court; John E. Mar-tineau, Chancellor;
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
This suit was brought by the Attorney General, on behalf of the State, to recover of appellee certain excise taxes alleged to be due under the act of April 25, 1873, and certain property taxes alleged to be due under the act of February 27, 1875. (Kirby’s Digest, § 4338).
The Attorney General, in his brief, concedes here that the act of 1875, under which he seeks to recover property taxes, is unconstitutional and void, and he asks only for a decree recovering the excise taxes alleged to be due under the act of 1873, which is as follows:
“It shall be the duty of every company or association .of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Philadelphia Fire Assn. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- State v. Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Atlanta National Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sims v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Gipson v. ManerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Citizens & Southern Bank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.