Legal Opinion

People ex rel. O'Meara v. City Council of Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original application for a writ of mandate to prevent tire city council of Salt Lake City from issuing bonds creating an indebtedness for the purpose of supplying the city with water, claiming that under section 4, article 14 of the Constitution the debt limit of the city is eight per cent of the value of the taxable property therein.

1Opinion of the CourtBaetch, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in this court, to obtain a writ of prohibition to prevent the city council of Salt Lake City from issuing certain city bonds and creating an indebtedness for the purpose of supplying the city with water. The petitioner in his affidavit, represents that the coun-' cil is about to issue a series of 250 bonds of the aggregate sum of $250,000, for the purpose of increasing the water supply and improving the waterworks of the city, pursuant to sees. 308, 309 and 310, R. S. 1898, which provides for the submission of the incurring of a bonded indebtedness to such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Society of Separationists, Inc. v. WhiteheadUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Salt Lake City v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Town of Camden v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Butler v. AndrusMontana Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API