Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Morgan

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1846PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by plaintiff for' a retaxation of defendants’ costs. An inquest *was taken in this cause at November circuit, 1844, in its regular order on the calendar, no one appearing on the part of the defendants. On the 8th February, 1845, defendants moved to set aside the inquest, which was granted on payment of costs of circuit and subsequent proceedings, and seven dollars costs of opposing the motion, plaintiff at liberty to perfect judgment to stand as security.

Read the full summary

Motion by plaintiff for' a retaxation of defendants’ costs. An inquest *was taken in this cause at November circuit, 1844, in its regular order on the calendar, no one appearing on the part of the defendants. On the 8th February, 1845, defendants moved to set aside the inquest, which was granted on payment of costs of circuit and subsequent proceedings, and seven dollars costs of opposing the motion, plaintiff at liberty to perfect judgment to stand as security. The defendants succeeded in the final event, and in their bill of costs charged “ Attorney and counsel fee prepared to try, $6; Dr.…

1Opinion of the Court

■ Beardsley, Justice.

Ordered a retaxation, on the ground that the items objected to were not taxable.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whipple v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API