Legal Opinion

Gross v. Perales

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur E. Blyn, J.

The basic issue presented by this CPLR article 78 proceeding is whether respondents New York State Department of Social Services (NYSDSS) and the State of New York (the State) acted properly in imposing an administrative penalty in the amount of $20 million on petitioner the City of New York (the City) in March 1983, for the City’s purported failure to promptly reduce or close social services grants.

*133Petitioner New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) is responsible for administering the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) and Home Relief programs in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaudoin v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. City of New York v. BlumNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gross v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Flowers v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Krauskopf v. PeralesNew York Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API