Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sessa v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 1978Published

1Dissent

Herlihy, J. (dissenting).

The majority contends that Matter of Beary v City of Rye (44 NY2d 398) considered a problem of statutory construction so analogous to the amendment of the Court of Claims Act accomplished by chapter 280 of the Laws of 1976 as to require a finding that the instant claim, as well as the claims heretofore considered in Paul v State of New York (59 AD2d 800) and Lewis v State of New York (60 AD2d 675), must be dismissed for a failure of timely filing.

*337In Beary the court was considering the recent amendment to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law which had the effect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Paul v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API