Hogan v. Baltimore & O. R.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
This cause • was decided below on a demurrer to the petition as amended. The relevant facts alleged were that defendant was engaged in both intrastate and interstate commerce; that plaintiff was its employee as a car repairer at Toledo, Ohio, and as such was required to straighten the handholds on railway cars; that the usual and proper implement for such work was a buggy bar, having a curved end for digging into and gripping the woodwork; that plaintiff had repeatedly requested his superiors to furnish him a buggy bar with which to do the work, but they had refused to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pryor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Connole v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hallstein v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929