Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Baltimore & O. R.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1926No. 4621PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

This cause • was decided below on a demurrer to the petition as amended. The relevant facts alleged were that defendant was engaged in both intrastate and interstate commerce; that plaintiff was its employee as a car repairer at Toledo, Ohio, and as such was required to straighten the handholds on railway cars; that the usual and proper implement for such work was a buggy bar, having a curved end for digging into and gripping the woodwork; that plaintiff had repeatedly requested his superiors to furnish him a buggy bar with which to do the work, but they had refused to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Pryor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Connole v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hallstein v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API