Legal Opinion

State v. . McLean

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The defendant excepted to the order consolidating for trial the three bills of indictment. In this ruling there was no error. C. S., 4622, authorizes the consolidation of two or more bills “when there are several charges against any person . . . for two or more acts or transactions connected together, or for two or more transactions of the same class of crimes or offenses.” State v. Brown, 182 N. C., 761; State v. Rice, 202 N. C., 411.

Defendant’s exception to the denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit cannot he sustained. There was evidence sufficient to he submitted to the jury. In the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. McDonald.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. State v. . LancasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . FainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. . RawlsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. State v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API