Legal Opinion
Makwinski v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 9, 1978Published
1Opinion of the Court
76 N.J. 87 (1978)
385 A.2d 1227
CHARLES L. MAKWINSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CONSOLIDATED POLICE AND FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND, DIVISION OF PENSIONS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 23, 1978.
Decided May 9, 1978.
Mr. Steven D. Altman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Benedict, Orban and Altman, attorneys).
Ms. Prudence H. Bisbee, Deputy Attorney General argued the cause for respondent (Ms. Erminie L. Conley, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Spina v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Ballurio v. CastelliniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- McFeely v. Board of Pension CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.