Legal Opinion
Toomey v. Blum
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.
*671The decision of the Federal District Court, which denied petitioners’ request for relief for the period from September, 1976 to June 1, 1977, was based exclusively upon that court’s conclusion that it had no authority to award such relief (Greklek v Toia [77 CV-228, NDNY, Sept. 30,1977], affd 565 F2d 1259, cert den sub nom. Blum v Toomey, 436 US 962; see Edelman v Jordan, 415 US 651; but cf. Holley v Lavine, 464 F Supp 718, affd 605 F2d 638, cert…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Holley Ex Rel. McQuoid v. LavineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1979
- Blum v. ToomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harder's Express, Inc. v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hodecker v. BlumDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1981
- Jackson Ex Rel. Forrest v. MullanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Strack v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989