Commonwealth v. Curry
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
There was no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion in the alternative for leave to withdraw his guilty pleas or for a new trial. 1. A review of the transcript of the hearing at which the pleas were accepted (see Commonwealth v. Foster, 368 Mass. 100, 102-103, 108 [1975]) discloses that (with one exception not here material) the questions which the judge put to the defendant included the substance (if not the actual language) of all the questions which were considered sufficient in Commonwealth, v. Taylor, 370 Mass. 141, 144-145 n.5 (1976). As in that case, "[t]he transcript further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MorrowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. McGuirkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. DamianoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. WhitfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CavanaughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.