Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases). Pennsylvania Power Utility Commission v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 4, 1952No. 10236, 10239, 10531Published

1DissentWilbur K. Miller, Circuit Judge

It is my view that this court should have granted petitioners’ motions to annul the rate reduction orders of the Federal Power Commission. The decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 184 F.2d 552, which held null and void the contractual arrangement between Pennsylvania Water & Power Company and Consolidated Gas Electric Light and Power Company of Baltimore, to which the orders were intended to apply prospectively, imperatively required that the case before us be remanded to the Commission to work out with the utilities some different plan for interchange of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore (Public Service Commission of Maryland, Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  5. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API