Masztal v. Meritplan Insurance
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon the Motion of Defendant Meritplan Insurance Company [“Meritplan” or “Defendant”], filed September 22, 2008[7-1], to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff Carl Masztal has not filed, and has informed the Court that he will not file, a Response to the Motion. The Court, having considered the record, the pleadings on file, the brief and argument of Defendant, and the relevant legal authorities, finds that Plaintiff should be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Webb v. Investacorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Joan Chason ALFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC. and Don L. Harris, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicholas Services, LLC v. Bombardier Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2023