Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. Farrar

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to foreclose a tax lien.

1Opinion of the CourtDavy, J.

This action is brought to foreclose a tax lien. The principal question in dispute is whether the strip of land assessed is sufficiently described on the assessment-roll to identify and indicate that it is the defendant Farrar’s property. He contends that the land which was intended to be assessed to Selye, his grantor, was not described on the assessment-roll ; therefore, this action cannot be maintained.

It is conceded that the following is an exact copy of the assessment as it appears upon the assessment-roll each year:

“'Name of person assessed........De V. W. Selye.
“Lot No......1, 2, 3, 4,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Tallman v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  3. May v. . TraphagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Chase v. . ChaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Dever v. HagertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. National Park Bank v. MetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Hennepin Improvement Co. v. SchusterNew York Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API