Reformed Bethanien Church v. Ochsner
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This litigation arose out of a schismVin a religious society. The defendunbs_Ai^_in--possession of Lot# 7, 8 and 9, Block 20, John D. Lawler’s Addition to Scotland, South Dakota, and of a church building and parsonage located thereon asjhe repre.s.ánfatiyÍs of the Evangelical and ReformedNIhurch,- a-general-fedemtea..-eac.lesiastical body. The plaintiffs seek to quiet title thereto in the Reformed Bethanien Church, alleged to be an independent local church.' The trial resulted in a judgment for’the_defSndnnts> and the plaintiffs have appealed.
A brief outline of the factual background of this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Mack v. KimeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Ramsey v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Barkley v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
- Presbytery of Bismarck v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foss v. DykstraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Foss v. DykstraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Baldwin v. MillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977