Legal Opinion

Reformed Bethanien Church v. Ochsner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1948No. File No. 8936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This litigation arose out of a schismVin a religious society. The defendunbs_Ai^_in--possession of Lot# 7, 8 and 9, Block 20, John D. Lawler’s Addition to Scotland, South Dakota, and of a church building and parsonage located thereon asjhe repre.s.ánfatiyÍs of the Evangelical and ReformedNIhurch,- a-general-fedemtea..-eac.lesiastical body. The plaintiffs seek to quiet title thereto in the Reformed Bethanien Church, alleged to be an independent local church.' The trial resulted in a judgment for’the_defSndnnts> and the plaintiffs have appealed.

A brief outline of the factual background of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Mack v. KimeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Ramsey v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Barkley v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
  5. Presbytery of Bismarck v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foss v. DykstraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Foss v. DykstraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Baldwin v. MillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API