Legal Opinion

Timothy Franzen, Intervenor v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 2021No. A21A0267Published

1Opinion of the Court

FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., BARNES, P. J., and RICKMAN, P.J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES. March 29, 2021 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A21A0259. TIMOTHY FRANZEN, INTERVENOR et al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA. A21A0267. TIMOTHY FRANZEN, INTERVENOR et al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA. RICKMAN, Presiding Judge. This case involves two of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. City of Decatur v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. City of Buchanan v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Savage v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. City of Atlanta v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API