Legal Opinion

Criton Corp. v. Highlands Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1991No. B14-90-608-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

In a non-jury trial the court rendered judgment in favor of the appellees Layton Bridge Company (Layton) and its surety, Highlands Insurance Company (Highlands). Appellant alleges error concerning attorneys’ fees and insufficient evidence. We affirm.

On October 20, 1986, Layton and Criton executed a Purchase Order which formed the basis for a subcontract. Layton was the general contractor in a bridge building project for Harris County, Texas. Highlands was Layton’s surety on the project and provided the statutory performance and payment bonds. Criton negotiated with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Murray v. O & a Express, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  2. Vingcard A.S. v. Merrimac Hospitality Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. City of Amarillo v. Glick, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  4. Flagship Hotel, Ltd. v. City of Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Mohnke v. Greenwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API