Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fors v. Farrell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 37,921Published

1DissentButzel, J.

Under the National banking act the First & Old National Bank of Detroit was precluded from dealing in stocks, bond and investment securities, for a long time considered a very profitable trade, somewhat correlated to, but distinct from, the banking’ business. The reciprocal advantages accruing to a large bank and a very closely affiliated investment company were manifest. In 1919 the First National Company of Detroit was organized under the State law, to engage in the buying, selling and holding of stocks and bonds, and for other purposes. Under a general deposit agreement, all of the stock…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. In re Watertown Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  5. Ohio Valley National Bank v. HulittSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API