Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Kemp
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 23, 1919No. 1 Div. 83PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.' Action by Mrs. A. B. York against W. H. Kemp. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Appeals (16 Ala. App. 675, 81 South. 195), and defendant petitions for certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
This was an action on the case for malicious prosecution brought to the circuit court of Mobile, the complaint alleging, inter alia, that the charge upon which plaintiff had been prosecuted had been judicially investigated, and said' prosecution ended, and plaintiff discharged. Defendant pleaded specially as follows:
“(2) For further plea in this behalf the defendant says that the said cause in which the plaintiff was arrested was tried in the inferio-r criminal court, from which said warrant issued, and that the plaintiff was convicted of the offense for which she was arrested in the said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blunt v. LittleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
- Jordan v. Ala. Great So. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- De Soto Coal, Mining & Development Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Skeffington v. EylwardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Saunders v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Boothby Realty Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Birwood Paper Company v. DamskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Chapman v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.