Jerome Curry v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER JR., Judge.
Introduction
Jerome Curry (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 1 (Rule 29.15 Motion) without an evidentiary hearing. He argues his motion adequately alleged his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request that the trial court instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of robbery in the second degree. We affirm.
Background
Movant was charged as an accomplice with robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest. These…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Gill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Oplinger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- STEPHEN K. COX v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Daniel C. Harmon, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Wayne v. StangeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024