Legal Opinion

Jerome Curry v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2014No. ED100403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER JR., Judge.

Introduction

Jerome Curry (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 1 (Rule 29.15 Motion) without an evidentiary hearing. He argues his motion adequately alleged his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request that the trial court instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of robbery in the second degree. We affirm.

Background

Movant was charged as an accomplice with robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest. These…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. Gill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Oplinger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. STEPHEN K. COX v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Daniel C. Harmon, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Wayne v. StangeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API