Legal Opinion

Weatherford v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 2005No. CACR 05-364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karen R. Baker, Judge.

Appellant Charles Weatherford udgeby . Fort Smith Police Department on December 30, 2003, and charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia, and simultaneous possession of drugs and a firearm. Appellant filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized, arguing that information provided by an informant was overly vague and insufficiently detailed, and also that the informant did not meet the legal requirements for reliability. The trial court denied the motion and the appellant entered a conditional plea of nolo…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. State v. BybeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Kaiser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tommy F. Hamilton v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Eastin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Eastin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API